This paper presents a comparative analysis of the performance of raft and piled raft foundations using the case study of a 29-storey building designed for the seismically hazardous area of Grozny. The investigation is based on numerical modelling of the interaction within the “structure–foundation–multilayered soil” system taking into account the actual geotechnical conditions and dynamic properties of soil. Seismic loading is considered as a stationary random process. The analysis investigates the distribution of resonant frequencies of the system, the spectral density of the random acceleration function of the system, and its dynamic amplification factor. Frequency characteristics of the building were obtained using the LIRA-SOFT software package. The evaluation of the dynamic amplification factor was carried out by solving a stochastic problem of wave propagation in a multilayered medium.
The results demonstrate that the piled raft foundation reduces the dynamic response of the building. Despite its higher cost, the use of such a foundation is justified in the conditions of increased seismic hazard and weak soils. The obtained findings allow us to recommend a piled raft foundation as the preferred structural solution for high-rise buildings under engineering-geological and seismic conditions similar to those of Grozny.
The results demonstrate that the piled raft foundation reduces the dynamic response of the building. Despite its higher cost, the use of such a foundation is justified in the conditions of increased seismic hazard and weak soils. The obtained findings allow us to recommend a piled raft foundation as the preferred structural solution for high-rise buildings under engineering-geological and seismic conditions similar to those of Grozny.
1. Kumar A., Kulbhushan K.K. Design of earthquake resistant structure of multi-story RCC building. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2019. 6 (6). P. 89 – 94.
2. Dhage A., Solanke S.S. Comparative analysis of raft, pile and piled raft foundation using designing software. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2023. 1193 (1). P. 1 – 8. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1193/1/012006.
3. Waghela B.R., Velakkappadi D.D., Yadav P.P., Mohammad Naved Q. Comparison of building with and without foundation resting on soft soil. International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation. 2023. 8 (4). P. 1480 – 1486.
4. Bapir B., Abrahamczyk L., Wichtmann T., Prada-Sarmiento L.F. Soil-structure interaction: A state-of-the-art review of modeling techniques and studies on seismic response of building structures. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2023. 9. P. 1120351. DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1120351.
5. Nguyen N.T., Ngo V.-L. A review of soil–foundation–structure interaction and structure–soil–structure interaction effects based on numerical simulations. Journal of Water and Land Development. 2025. 66. P. 1 – 12. DOI: 10.24425/jwld.2025.155295.
6. Jang H., Yoon J., Cho W., Lee J. Effects of structural dynamic characteristics on soil–structure interaction (SSI) analysis of high-frequency-dominant seismic excitation. Applied Sciences. 2025. 15 (7). P. 3679. DOI: 10.3390/app15073679.
7. Çetindemir O. A review of modeling issues on the seismic soil-pile-structure interaction. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2024. 28 (8). P. 3359 – 3377. DOI: 10.1007/s12205-024-1108-2.
8. Bariker P., Kolathayar S. Dynamic soil structure interaction of a high-rise building resting over a finned pile mat. Infrastructures. 2022. 7. P. 142. DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures7100142.
9. Sobolev E.S., Berezin E.K., Kechina T.V. Comparative analysis of the dynamic stability of a multistorey building with different base arrangements. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. 1928 (1). P. 012018. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1928/1/012018.
10. Klyuev S.V., Slobodchikova N.A., Saidumov M.S., Abumuslimov A.S., Mezhidov D.A., Khezhev T.A. Application of ash and slag waste from coal combustion in the construction of the earth bed of roads. Construction Materials and Products. 2024. 7 (6). P. 3. DOI: 10.58224/2618-7183-2024-7-6-3.
11. Hokmabadi A.S., Fatahi B. Influence of foundation type on seismic performance of buildings considering soil–structure interaction. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics. 2016. 16 (12). P. 1550043. DOI: 10.1142/S0219455415500431.
12. Zubritsky M.A., Ushakov O.Yu., Sabitov L.S., Alekhin V.N. Foundation type influence on the construction site seismicity. Akademicheskij Vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN. 2024. 2. P. 70 – 74.
13. Messaoudi A., Nourredine M., Hadid M., Laouami N. Effects of soil heterogeneities on its seismic responses. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. 2024. P. 221 – 232. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-57357-6_19.
14. Messaoudi A., Mezouar N., Hadid M., Laouami N. Effects of soil heterogeneities on its seismic responses. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 2024. 401. P. 221 – 232. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-57357-6_19.
15. Berkane D., Harichane Z., Guellil M.E. et al. Investigation of soil layers stochasticity effects on the spatially varying seismic response spectra. Indian Geotechnical Journal. 2019. 49. P. 151 – 160. DOI: 10.1007/s40098-018-0301-y
16. Guellil M.E., Harichane Z., Çelebi A. Comparison between non-linear and stochastic methods for dynamic SSI problems. Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation. 2019. P. 191 – 194. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01656-2_43
17. Guellil M.E., Harichane Z., Çelebi E. Seismic codes based equivalent nonlinear and stochastic soil-structure interaction analysis. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica. 2020. 43 (1). P. 1 – 14. DOI: 10.2478/sgem-2020-0007
18. Khachiyan E.E. Seismic impacts and prediction of the behavior of structures. Yerevan: Gitutyun, 2015. 555 p.
19. Pshenichkina V.A., Rekunov S.S., Ivanov S.Yu. Probabilistic analysis of dynamic characteristics of the structure – layered foundation system. News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction. 2024. 8. P. 32 – 43. DOI: 10.32683/0536-1052-2024-788-8-32-43
20. Stupishin L., Mondrus V. Energy properties of symmetric deformable systems. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2024. 20 (1). P. 35 – 45.
21. Ivanov S.Yu., Rekunov S.S., Pshenichkina V.A., Churakov A.A., Anokhin S.V. Dynamic characteristics of a layered system. Certificate of state registration of computer program n. 2024614957. Russian Federation. 2024.
22. Korol O.A., Barabanova T.A., Abdullazianov E.U., Sabitov L.S., Ayzatullin M.M. Stress–strain state during the formation of normal cracks in three-layer bendable reinforced concrete elements under the action of longitudinal and transverse forces. Construction Materials and Products. 2024. 7 (1). P. 3. DOI: 10.58224/2618-7183-2024-7-1-3
23. Nuzhdin L.V., Mikhaylov V.S. Method of accounting for resonance effects in forecasting vibrations of large-size pile foundations. News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction. 2025. 5. P. 82 – 95. DOI: 10.32683/0536-1052-2025-797-5-82-95
2. Dhage A., Solanke S.S. Comparative analysis of raft, pile and piled raft foundation using designing software. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2023. 1193 (1). P. 1 – 8. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1193/1/012006.
3. Waghela B.R., Velakkappadi D.D., Yadav P.P., Mohammad Naved Q. Comparison of building with and without foundation resting on soft soil. International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation. 2023. 8 (4). P. 1480 – 1486.
4. Bapir B., Abrahamczyk L., Wichtmann T., Prada-Sarmiento L.F. Soil-structure interaction: A state-of-the-art review of modeling techniques and studies on seismic response of building structures. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2023. 9. P. 1120351. DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1120351.
5. Nguyen N.T., Ngo V.-L. A review of soil–foundation–structure interaction and structure–soil–structure interaction effects based on numerical simulations. Journal of Water and Land Development. 2025. 66. P. 1 – 12. DOI: 10.24425/jwld.2025.155295.
6. Jang H., Yoon J., Cho W., Lee J. Effects of structural dynamic characteristics on soil–structure interaction (SSI) analysis of high-frequency-dominant seismic excitation. Applied Sciences. 2025. 15 (7). P. 3679. DOI: 10.3390/app15073679.
7. Çetindemir O. A review of modeling issues on the seismic soil-pile-structure interaction. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2024. 28 (8). P. 3359 – 3377. DOI: 10.1007/s12205-024-1108-2.
8. Bariker P., Kolathayar S. Dynamic soil structure interaction of a high-rise building resting over a finned pile mat. Infrastructures. 2022. 7. P. 142. DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures7100142.
9. Sobolev E.S., Berezin E.K., Kechina T.V. Comparative analysis of the dynamic stability of a multistorey building with different base arrangements. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. 1928 (1). P. 012018. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1928/1/012018.
10. Klyuev S.V., Slobodchikova N.A., Saidumov M.S., Abumuslimov A.S., Mezhidov D.A., Khezhev T.A. Application of ash and slag waste from coal combustion in the construction of the earth bed of roads. Construction Materials and Products. 2024. 7 (6). P. 3. DOI: 10.58224/2618-7183-2024-7-6-3.
11. Hokmabadi A.S., Fatahi B. Influence of foundation type on seismic performance of buildings considering soil–structure interaction. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics. 2016. 16 (12). P. 1550043. DOI: 10.1142/S0219455415500431.
12. Zubritsky M.A., Ushakov O.Yu., Sabitov L.S., Alekhin V.N. Foundation type influence on the construction site seismicity. Akademicheskij Vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN. 2024. 2. P. 70 – 74.
13. Messaoudi A., Nourredine M., Hadid M., Laouami N. Effects of soil heterogeneities on its seismic responses. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. 2024. P. 221 – 232. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-57357-6_19.
14. Messaoudi A., Mezouar N., Hadid M., Laouami N. Effects of soil heterogeneities on its seismic responses. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 2024. 401. P. 221 – 232. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-57357-6_19.
15. Berkane D., Harichane Z., Guellil M.E. et al. Investigation of soil layers stochasticity effects on the spatially varying seismic response spectra. Indian Geotechnical Journal. 2019. 49. P. 151 – 160. DOI: 10.1007/s40098-018-0301-y
16. Guellil M.E., Harichane Z., Çelebi A. Comparison between non-linear and stochastic methods for dynamic SSI problems. Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation. 2019. P. 191 – 194. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01656-2_43
17. Guellil M.E., Harichane Z., Çelebi E. Seismic codes based equivalent nonlinear and stochastic soil-structure interaction analysis. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica. 2020. 43 (1). P. 1 – 14. DOI: 10.2478/sgem-2020-0007
18. Khachiyan E.E. Seismic impacts and prediction of the behavior of structures. Yerevan: Gitutyun, 2015. 555 p.
19. Pshenichkina V.A., Rekunov S.S., Ivanov S.Yu. Probabilistic analysis of dynamic characteristics of the structure – layered foundation system. News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction. 2024. 8. P. 32 – 43. DOI: 10.32683/0536-1052-2024-788-8-32-43
20. Stupishin L., Mondrus V. Energy properties of symmetric deformable systems. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2024. 20 (1). P. 35 – 45.
21. Ivanov S.Yu., Rekunov S.S., Pshenichkina V.A., Churakov A.A., Anokhin S.V. Dynamic characteristics of a layered system. Certificate of state registration of computer program n. 2024614957. Russian Federation. 2024.
22. Korol O.A., Barabanova T.A., Abdullazianov E.U., Sabitov L.S., Ayzatullin M.M. Stress–strain state during the formation of normal cracks in three-layer bendable reinforced concrete elements under the action of longitudinal and transverse forces. Construction Materials and Products. 2024. 7 (1). P. 3. DOI: 10.58224/2618-7183-2024-7-1-3
23. Nuzhdin L.V., Mikhaylov V.S. Method of accounting for resonance effects in forecasting vibrations of large-size pile foundations. News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction. 2025. 5. P. 82 – 95. DOI: 10.32683/0536-1052-2025-797-5-82-95
Pshenichkina V.A., Ivanov S.Yu., Drozdov V.V., Sabitov L.S., Kiiamova L.I. Assessment of seismic response of a 29-storey building on raft and piled raft foundations considering soil–structure interaction. Construction Materials and Products. 2026. 9 (1). 1. https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2026-9-1-1

Русский
English