Русский
English
School plays a key role in the development of a person's personality throughout their life. The educational atmosphere largely shapes behavior patterns, especially for children and adolescents. The foundations laid at an early age often become decisive for the further development of the personality. Today, approaches to the educational process have undergone significant changes. The article presents a methodology developed by the authors that allows assessing the quality of architectural spaces of educational institutions by four main parameters. This will allow obtaining an objective picture of the state of educational spaces and making adequate architectural and design decisions at the administrative level. This work is based on an integrated approach to assessing architectural space, developing universal assessment models that allow correlating different-quality characteristics of school subsystems into a single assessment system, which will allow obtaining a quantitative assessment of the state of spatial indicators of educational institutions. Methods for assessing architectural spaces of educational institutions suggest entering a new stage of designing specific schools, eliminating serious consequences of architectural and design errors with large budget losses when implementing poor-quality development scenarios. The priority task of reforming the system of public authority is to create a qualitatively new level of public administration efficiency, including in matters of spatial development of educational institutions and renovation of existing schools. Because of the study, the main criteria and indicators of the quality of the architectural educational space were developed. The matrix of criteria includes such evaluation blocks as safe environmental design; formation of space; inclusiveness; stages of the physical condition of the building. The evaluation criteria were tested and refined in schools of the Republic of Bashkortostan. The results of the project implementation are methodological tools for assessing the quality of architectural spaces of educational institutions, an application for assessing the initial level of quality of architectural space, modeling the architectural planning solution of an educational institution and estimate documentation at the stage of an application for major repairs.
[1] Ale T. A., Ayeni D.A. Enhancement of work place comfort through the use of soft landscape. City Territ Archit. 2024. 11. Р. 5 – 6.
[2] Balova S.L., de Velazco J.J.H.G., Polozhentseva I.V., Chernavsky M.Y., Shubtsov, L.V. The formation of the concept of smart sustainable city with the purpose of environmental protection. J. Environ. Managem. 2021. 12. Р. 1269 – 1275.
[3] Barrese J. Efficiency and equity considerations in the operation of transfer of development right plans. Land Economics. 1983. 59. Р. 238 – 245.
[4] Debord G. Psychogeography. Ad Marginem Press. Moscow. 2017. Р. 75 – 78.
[5] Dessouky N. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2016. 34. Р. 401 – 410. Doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.035
[6] Digital Talent. Road to 2020 and beyond: A national strategy to develop Canada’s talent in a Global Digital Economy. Information and communications technology council. Ottawa. 2017. Р. 7 – 8.
[7] Fairclough G., Sarlov I., Swanwick C. Routledge handbook of Landscape Character Assessment. Current approaches to characterization and assessment. Routledge. London. 2018. Р. 42 – 48.
[8] Hallsmith G. The key to sustainable cities: Meeting human needs. Transforming community systems. New Society. 2003. Р. 220 – 223.
[9] Ivanova E.V. Foreign experience of architectural planning of the subject-spatial environment of modern schools. Bulletin of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology. 2014. Р. 73 – 80.
[10] Ivashova V.A. Social practice of urban environment quality assessment. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 775. IOP Publishing Ltd, Samara. 2020. P. 3 – 5.
[11] Jagodzińska K. Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe. Full Report. 2015. P. 9 – 11.
[12] Kornienko St. Energy efficiency, environmental safety, economic efficiency – priority tasks of «green» construction. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: Construction and Architecture. 2017. 49. P. 167 – 177.
[13] Kuripta O., Popova E., Osipova S. Conceptual aspects of designing a software application for calculating the sustainability class of the habitat for real estate objects. Technology and technology: ways of innovative development. 2021. P. 125 – 132.
[14] Lagutenkov A. Smart city: from concept to implementation. Sci. and Life. 8. 2018. P. 102 – 106.
[15] Maruna M., Rodic D., Colic R. Remodelling urban planning education for sustainable development: the case of Serbia. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2018. 19. P. 658 – 680.
[16] Naguib D. Towards sustainability in Eco-cities, Faculty of Engineering. Cairo University. 2014. P. 2 – 8.
[17] Pryadko I., Ivanova Z. Biosphere and social processes in the aspect of the design of the urban environment. Industrial and civil construction. 2017. 10. P. 12 – 17.
[18] Smart Cities. Smart Technologies and Infrastructure for Energy, Water, Transportation, Buildings, and Government. Business Drivers. City and Supplier Profiles Market Analysis, and Forecasts Research Report. Executive Summary Boulder (CO, USA: Navigant Consulting, Inc). 2011. P. 88 – 112.
[19] Vinogradova I. Modern school space: the main aspects of transformation. A new look, International Scientific Bulletin. 2016. 14. P. 131 – 132.
[20] Yin, R. Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage. 2013. P. 171 – 178.
[2] Balova S.L., de Velazco J.J.H.G., Polozhentseva I.V., Chernavsky M.Y., Shubtsov, L.V. The formation of the concept of smart sustainable city with the purpose of environmental protection. J. Environ. Managem. 2021. 12. Р. 1269 – 1275.
[3] Barrese J. Efficiency and equity considerations in the operation of transfer of development right plans. Land Economics. 1983. 59. Р. 238 – 245.
[4] Debord G. Psychogeography. Ad Marginem Press. Moscow. 2017. Р. 75 – 78.
[5] Dessouky N. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2016. 34. Р. 401 – 410. Doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.035
[6] Digital Talent. Road to 2020 and beyond: A national strategy to develop Canada’s talent in a Global Digital Economy. Information and communications technology council. Ottawa. 2017. Р. 7 – 8.
[7] Fairclough G., Sarlov I., Swanwick C. Routledge handbook of Landscape Character Assessment. Current approaches to characterization and assessment. Routledge. London. 2018. Р. 42 – 48.
[8] Hallsmith G. The key to sustainable cities: Meeting human needs. Transforming community systems. New Society. 2003. Р. 220 – 223.
[9] Ivanova E.V. Foreign experience of architectural planning of the subject-spatial environment of modern schools. Bulletin of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology. 2014. Р. 73 – 80.
[10] Ivashova V.A. Social practice of urban environment quality assessment. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 775. IOP Publishing Ltd, Samara. 2020. P. 3 – 5.
[11] Jagodzińska K. Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe. Full Report. 2015. P. 9 – 11.
[12] Kornienko St. Energy efficiency, environmental safety, economic efficiency – priority tasks of «green» construction. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: Construction and Architecture. 2017. 49. P. 167 – 177.
[13] Kuripta O., Popova E., Osipova S. Conceptual aspects of designing a software application for calculating the sustainability class of the habitat for real estate objects. Technology and technology: ways of innovative development. 2021. P. 125 – 132.
[14] Lagutenkov A. Smart city: from concept to implementation. Sci. and Life. 8. 2018. P. 102 – 106.
[15] Maruna M., Rodic D., Colic R. Remodelling urban planning education for sustainable development: the case of Serbia. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2018. 19. P. 658 – 680.
[16] Naguib D. Towards sustainability in Eco-cities, Faculty of Engineering. Cairo University. 2014. P. 2 – 8.
[17] Pryadko I., Ivanova Z. Biosphere and social processes in the aspect of the design of the urban environment. Industrial and civil construction. 2017. 10. P. 12 – 17.
[18] Smart Cities. Smart Technologies and Infrastructure for Energy, Water, Transportation, Buildings, and Government. Business Drivers. City and Supplier Profiles Market Analysis, and Forecasts Research Report. Executive Summary Boulder (CO, USA: Navigant Consulting, Inc). 2011. P. 88 – 112.
[19] Vinogradova I. Modern school space: the main aspects of transformation. A new look, International Scientific Bulletin. 2016. 14. P. 131 – 132.
[20] Yin, R. Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage. 2013. P. 171 – 178.
Baymuratova S.Kh., Baymuratov R.F., Kudasheva D.R., Prokudina E.K., Kinyagulov N.R. Methods for assessing the quality of architectural spaces of educational institutions. Construction Materials and Products. 2025. 8 (1). 9. https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2025-8-1-9