The article deals with the problem of making industrial decisions related to the construction of industrial facilities. The scheme of decision-making is presented, with consideration of its individual components. A method of collective decision-making is proposed for use on a construction site. In general, the idea of using collective intelligence in terms of solving production tasks is justified from the position of objectivity of conclusions. The essence is to obtain estimates for the required number of properties, based on the experience and knowledge of a group of individuals united in a single commission. If the procedure for creating an expert commission and processing the results of expert evaluations is followed, this method becomes a tool for relatively quick decision-making.
The research was based on the work of a number of authors who worked on the problem of expert decision-making methods. The article describes the main stages of applying expert assessment of properties. Various methods of acceptance, processing and output of the examination results at all stages of the survey are presented.
A conceptual scheme for organizing an expert commission was created. A distinctive feature of the project is the setting of a task for specialists, in the interpretation necessary for production. This means that for the same task, the expert, depending on a number of circumstances, can give opposite conclusions.
Based on the research, we can conclude that decision-making tools like the expert commission are in demand. This article shows how to use corrective formulas to turn a collective decision into a reasonable, objective answer to a question.
1. Upravlencheskie resheniya v ekonomicheskih sistemah: ucheb. Pod. red. A.I. Afonichkin, D.G. Mihalenko. SPb.: Piter, 2009. P. 10. (rus.)
2. Prinyatie nauchnyh reshenij v upravlenii predpriyatiem. H. Djhun. Nauchno-tekhnicheskoe, informacionnoe razvitie i ekonomika. SHansi. 2008. 15. (rus.)
3. Metody prinyatiya upravlencheskih reshenij: ucheb. V.V. Plenkina, I.V. Osinovskaya, O.V. Lenkova Tyumen'. TIU. 2017. p 133,134. (rus.)
4. Klyuev S.V., Klyuev A.V. Upravlenie proektnymi parametrami v zadachah optimal'nogo proektirovaniya. Stroitel'naya mekhanika inzhenernyh konstrukcij i sooruzhenij. 2010. 1. P. 15 – 19. (rus.)
5. Klyuev S.V. Osnovy konstruktivnoj organizacii prirodnyh i iskusstvennyh materialov. Sovremennye tekhnologii v promyshlennosti stroitel'nyh materialov i strojindustrii: sb. stud. dokl. Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa: v 2 ch. CH. 1. Belgorod: Izd-vo BGTU im. V.G. SHuhova, 2003. P. 161 – 163. (rus.)
6. Mnogoekstremal'nye zadachi v proektirovanii: ucheb. Pod red. I.B. Mockus M. «Nauka» 1967. P. 134. (rus.)
7. Podol'skaya M.N. Kvalimetriya i upravlenie kachestvom: ucheb. pod red. Tambov. Izdatel'stvo FGBOU VPO «TGTU». 2011. P. 14, 15. (rus.)
8. Azgal'dov G.G., Rajhman E. P. O kvalimetrii. Izd-vo Standartov. Moskva, 1973. P. 52 – 55. (rus.)
9. Metody prinyatiya upravlencheskih reshenij: ucheb. V.V. Plenkina, I.V. Osinovskaya, O.V. Lenkova Tyumen'. TIU. 2017. P. 24. (rus.)
10. Fedyukin V.K. Kvalimetriya. Izmerenie kachestva promyshlennoj produkcii. Knorus, 2015. P. 128 – 130. (rus.)
11. Ajkozhaev N.M. Ocenka stepeni soglasovannosti mnenij ekspertov. Tez. dokl. Studencheskoj mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj zaochnoj konferencii «Nauchnoe soobshchestvo studentov XXI stoletiya, 2017. (rus.)
12. Harchenko M.A. Korrelyacionnyj analiz. Izdatel'sko-poligraficheskij centr Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008. P. 23 – 25. (rus.)
Ismailov R.I. Making production decisions using the expert assessment procedure. Construction Materials and Products. 2020. 3 (1). P. 49 – 56.