Use of modern materials in biodirectional architecture

https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2022-5-5-59-69
We live in a dynamic time and the need for evolution in architecture is inevitable. With the advent of new generations and the development of technological progress, modern styles, ideas, technologies and materials appear.
The purpose of the article is to explore new materials that promote innovation and renewal, which can be used in biodirectional architecture. The main types of biotechnological materials are identified, a forecast for the future formation is given, based on the development and design trends.
The main results of the study are to identify the vector of development of the natural approach in ar-chitecture. The value of the acquired knowledge lies in the fact that biotechnological materials are aimed at improving the quality of architecture and its harmonious coexistence with nature. The appli-cation of existing and new biotechnological materials will improve the urban fabric.
[1] Denisenko E.V. Principles of formation of architectural space on the basis of biological approaches: dis. ... Cand. of Archit. Nizhny Novgorod, 2013. P. 185. (rus.)
[2] Zhuikov S.V. The use of nanotechnology for the design of building structures. Construction materials and products. 2021. 4 (6). P. 26 – 47. (rus.)
[3] Petra Gruber. Biomimetic in architecture. A.: SpringerWienNewYork, 2019. 276 p.
[4] Lacroix A., Sleiman H.F. DNA Nanostructures: Current Challenges and Opportunities for Cellular Delivery. ACS Nano. 2021. 15 (3). P. 3631 – 3645.
[5] Andreas Muller. Smart materials in architecture, interior architecture and design. B.: P.: Arch, 2020. 187 p.
[6] Michael Addington. Daniel Schodek, Smart Materials and New Technologies. M.: Arh Architectural Press, 2019-2020. 254 p.
[7] Saprykina N.A. Thesaurus of parametric paradigm of architectural space formation. Architecture and modern information technologies. 2017. 3 (40). P. 281 – 303. (rus.)
[8] Etienne Benson. Environment between System and Nature: Alan Sonfist and the Art of the Cybernetic Environment, 2014. 228 p.
[9] Elyukhina V.A., Krasnobaev I.V. On the question of the relationship between architecture and construction technologies (based on materials of foreign publications). Proceedings of KSUACE. 2019. 2 (48). P. 40 – 47. (rus.)
[10] Giuseppe Strappa. City as organism. R.: U+D edition Rome, 2016. 482 p.
[11] Bryan Law, Dinel Mao, Jie Song, Algae anatomy. M.: Arh Architectural Design, 2019-2020. 120 p.
[12] Hannah Hansell. BIOmatters. MA. :Sustainable Design University of Brighton, 2017. 116 p.
[13] Shelby Burnett. Biophilic Design + Biomimicry. A.: P.: Arch, 2017. 93 p.
[14] Giuseppe Strappa. City as organism. R. : U+D edition Rome, 2016. 482 p.
[15] Sharifi A., Yamagata Y. Resilient Urban Planning: Major Principles and Criteria. Energy Procedia. 2014 p.
[16] Salekh M. Introduction of digital methods at different stages of architectural design. Architecture and modern information technologies. 2021. 1 (54). P. 268 – 278. (rus.)
[17] Remizov A.N. Eco-sustainable architecture as a process. Housing construction. 2016. 4. P. 48 – 51. (rus.)
Zhandarova A.A., Denisenko E.V. Use of modern materials in biodirectional architecture. Construction Materials and Products. 2022. 5 (5). P. 59 – 69. https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2022-5-5-59-69