English
Русский 50-60 p.
The article discusses current problems and trends in the development of post-pandemic living spaces of the future. Growth of population affects the increase in demand for development of new areas. The 21st century is a period of innovative ideas, whereby society will rethink, improve and transform the environment to ensure high-quality living standards for the population. Architecture is characterized by continuity from the surrounding world. The main goal of the project is to reveal criteria of architectural space, which will allow mankind to live in a comfortable environment, even in a period of forced critical conditions. After studying the theoretical basis, there was a need for a comparative analysis of modern residential facilities and in determining general trends in construction. Analysis of volume-planning structure and architectural project of living spaces in recent years helped to formulate directions in the development of the post-pandemic city. The hypothesis was formed during the research, which suggests that the increase in the number of ideas about cities of the future contribute to safety and adaptability, harmonious visual appearance, the development of modern technologies. The thought movement is expanding, which is helping to build cities over the next 20 to 30 years. This work can become the basis for conceptualizing and systematizing the vision of post-pandemic urbanism.
1. Bibri S.E., Krogstie J., Kärrholm M. Compact city planning and development: Emerging practices and strategies for achieving the goals of sustainability. Developments in the Built Environment. 2020. 4. P. 1 – 20.
2. Megahed N.A., Ghoneim E.M. Antivirus-built environment: Lessons learned from Covid-19 pandemic. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020. 61. P. 102350.
3. Scientific and educational portal IQ [Electronic resource]: Danger and purity. Pandemic through the prism of (anti)utopia. National Research University "Higher School of Economics"; ed. D. Kuznetsov. Moscow: Webmaster I.M. Kaspe, 2020. URL: https://iq.hse.ru/news/376188536.html (date of access: 02.04.22) (rus.)
4. Rajkumar R.P. COVID-19 and mental health: a review of the existing literature. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2020. 52. P. 102066.
5. Yusupova E.E., Gallyamova Z.M., Korotkova S.G. Development of a conceptual model of a multifunctional residential building based on the classification of sustainable design techniques. News of KSUCEA. 2019. 2 (48) P. 108 – 115. (rus.)
6. Ritter De Paris S., Nuno C., Lopes L. Housing flexibility problem: Review of recent limitations and so-lutions. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2018. 7 (1) P. 80 – 91.
7. Minabutdinova A.R., Agisheva I.N. Principles of formation of transformable living space. News of KSUCEA. 2019. 3 (49). P. 62 – 70. (rus.)
8. Danilov A.B., Reznichenko S.I., Bochaver K.A. Healthy built environment. Reserve opportunities for health promotion and economic growth. Special issue of the Institute of Interdisciplinary Medicine. M.: Pero, 2018. P. 2 – 40. ISBN 978-5-00122-352-8 (rus.)
9. Acuto M. COVID-19: Lessons for an urban(izing) world. One Earth. 2020. 4 (2). P. 317 – 319.
10. Hizra F., Dewi C. Houses amid COVID-19: Environmental challenges and design adaptation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021. 881. P. 012045.
11. Elsadekab M., Liu B, Lian Z. Green façades: Their contribution to stress recovery and well-being in high-density cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2021. 46. P. 126446. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126446
12. Montgomeri CH. Schastlivyj gorod. Moskva: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2019 g. 467 p. (rus.)
13. Biloria N. From smart to empathic cities. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2021. 10 (1). P. 3 – 16.
14. Risdiana D.M., Susanto T.D. The Safe City: Conceptual Model Development – A Systematic Litera-ture Review. Procedia Computer Science. 2019. 161. P. 291 – 299.
15. Crane M., Lloyd S., Haines A., Ding D., Hutchinson E., Belesova K., Davies M., Osrin D., Zimmermann N., Capon A., Wilkinson P., Turcue C. Transforming cities for sustainability: A health perspective. Environment International. 2021. 147. P. 147.
2. Megahed N.A., Ghoneim E.M. Antivirus-built environment: Lessons learned from Covid-19 pandemic. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020. 61. P. 102350.
3. Scientific and educational portal IQ [Electronic resource]: Danger and purity. Pandemic through the prism of (anti)utopia. National Research University "Higher School of Economics"; ed. D. Kuznetsov. Moscow: Webmaster I.M. Kaspe, 2020. URL: https://iq.hse.ru/news/376188536.html (date of access: 02.04.22) (rus.)
4. Rajkumar R.P. COVID-19 and mental health: a review of the existing literature. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2020. 52. P. 102066.
5. Yusupova E.E., Gallyamova Z.M., Korotkova S.G. Development of a conceptual model of a multifunctional residential building based on the classification of sustainable design techniques. News of KSUCEA. 2019. 2 (48) P. 108 – 115. (rus.)
6. Ritter De Paris S., Nuno C., Lopes L. Housing flexibility problem: Review of recent limitations and so-lutions. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2018. 7 (1) P. 80 – 91.
7. Minabutdinova A.R., Agisheva I.N. Principles of formation of transformable living space. News of KSUCEA. 2019. 3 (49). P. 62 – 70. (rus.)
8. Danilov A.B., Reznichenko S.I., Bochaver K.A. Healthy built environment. Reserve opportunities for health promotion and economic growth. Special issue of the Institute of Interdisciplinary Medicine. M.: Pero, 2018. P. 2 – 40. ISBN 978-5-00122-352-8 (rus.)
9. Acuto M. COVID-19: Lessons for an urban(izing) world. One Earth. 2020. 4 (2). P. 317 – 319.
10. Hizra F., Dewi C. Houses amid COVID-19: Environmental challenges and design adaptation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021. 881. P. 012045.
11. Elsadekab M., Liu B, Lian Z. Green façades: Their contribution to stress recovery and well-being in high-density cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2021. 46. P. 126446. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126446
12. Montgomeri CH. Schastlivyj gorod. Moskva: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2019 g. 467 p. (rus.)
13. Biloria N. From smart to empathic cities. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2021. 10 (1). P. 3 – 16.
14. Risdiana D.M., Susanto T.D. The Safe City: Conceptual Model Development – A Systematic Litera-ture Review. Procedia Computer Science. 2019. 161. P. 291 – 299.
15. Crane M., Lloyd S., Haines A., Ding D., Hutchinson E., Belesova K., Davies M., Osrin D., Zimmermann N., Capon A., Wilkinson P., Turcue C. Transforming cities for sustainability: A health perspective. Environment International. 2021. 147. P. 147.
Gimazutdinova E.O., Novikov S.V. Post-pandemic urbanism is the current reality. Construction Materials and Products. 2022. 5 (4). P. 50 – 60. https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2022-5-4-50-60