Injection mortars based on composite cements for soil fixation

https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2023-6-4-15-29
The fixation of subsidence soils is an important practical scientific and technical task, which makes it possible to carry out construction and repair work on weak (subsidence) base soils. Composite cements (CC) have been developed, including aluminosilicates (AS), obtained by enrichment of ash and slag mixture (up to 65 wt.%), Portland cement clinker and gypsum. Based on the developed CC, a wide range of injection solutions with water-binding ratios from 1.0 to 2.0, including screening of crushed granite from 0.7 fineness modules, has been created. The developed injection mortars are capable of effectively fixing the soils of the foundations of underground structures, providing the strength of the soil-concrete mass up to 25.6 MPa with a deformation modulus of 10.1 GPa. According to the sedimentation analysis of solutions, it can be seen that these materials have a percentage of water separation from 22.5% at W/B=1 to 36.5% at W/B=2. At the same time, the viscosity indicators of these materials indicate a high penetrating ability, since the time of the expiration of mortars through a Marsh viscometer for mortars IR5 and IR6 is 39 and 40 seconds at W / B = 1.5 and W/ B = 2, respec-tively. The effect of increasing the density of injection mortars on composite cement at the age of 28 days was maximum at an AS dosage of 45% by weight, then it decreased with an increase in the con-tent of the aluminosilicate component. There are high ratios of the values of strength properties on the second day to similar indicators in the 28-days age: for compressive strength 0.24 (0.20-0.22 for addi-tive-free clinker compositions), for flexural strength 0.16 (0.15 for additive-free clinker compositions; while increasing the AS content above 45%, this ratio decreases to 0.14). High early strength makes it possible to effectively use injection mortars for urgent fixing of soils during the repair of underground structures.
[1] Fan H., Li T., Gao Y., Deng K., Wu H. Characteristics inversion of underground goaf based on InSAR techniques and PIM. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2021. 103. P. 102526. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102526
[2] Guo D., Chen Y., Yang J., Tan Y.H., Zhang C., Chen Z. Planning and application of underground logistics systems in new cities and districts in China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2021. 113. P. 103947. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2021.103947
[3] Hebbal D., Marif Y., Hamdani M., Belhaj M.M., Bouguettaia H., Bechki D. The geothermal potential of underground buildings in hot climates: Case of Southern Algeria. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2021. 28. P. 101422. DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101422
[4] Dudin M.O., Vatin N.I., Barabanshchikov Y.G. Modeling a set of concrete strength in the program ELCUT at warming of monolithic structures by wire. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2015. 54 (2). P. 33 – 45.
[5] Lazarevska M., Cvetkovska M., Knezevic M., Trombeva Gavriloska A., Milanovic M., Murgul V., Vatin N. Neural network prognostic model for predicting the fire resistance of eccentrically loaded RC columns. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014. 627. P. 276 – 282.
[6] Li W., Wu Y., Choguill C.L., Lai S.-K., Luo J. Underground Hangzhou: The challenge of safety vs. commerciality in a major Chinese city. Cities. 2021. 19. P. 103414. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103414
[7] Kharchenko I.Ya., Panchenko A.I., Piskunov A.A., Kharchenko A.I., Mirzoyan M.M. Mineral injection mixtures for the construction and operation of underground structures in conditions of dense urban development. Housing construction. 2020. 10. P. 53 – 60. (rus.)
[8] Konovalova N.A. Scientific and practical justification for obtaining environmentally friendly building materials based on large-tonnage production waste: dis. ... doct. of Engineering Sciences. 1.5.15 Ecology (technical sciences). Irkutsk, 2022. 373 p. (rus.)
[9] Murtazaev S.-A.Yu., Abukhanov A.Z., Islamov A.A. Method of improving the foundations of buildings and structures. Bulletin of the Atyrau Institute of Oil and Gas. 2010. 4. P. 267 – 270. (rus.)
[10] Abukhanov A.Z., Murtazaev S.-A.Yu. et al. Pat. 2472898 RF, IPC E 02 D 27/00. Foundation with combined preparation. №2011131323/03, zajavl. 26.07.2011; publ. 20.01.2013, Bul. № 2. 5 p. (rus.)
[11] Huang J., Kogbara R.B., Little D.N. A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization. Construction and Building Materials. 2021. 305. Article 124685.
[12] Lomov P.O., Grebennikov I.O. Strengthening of the soils of the foundations of transport structures by reinforcing with a soil-cement mortar in conditions of the spread of permafrost soils. Fundamental and applied issues of transport. 2022. 4 (7). P. 103 – 110. (rus.)
[13] Wu T., Zhang Y., Cai Y.Dynamic response of sheet‒pile groin under tidal bore considering pile‒pile mutual interaction and hydrodynamic pressure. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2022. 164. Article 107568.
[14] Stolyarov V.G. Soil compaction: technological stresses and their accounting. News of higher educational institutions. The North Caucasus region. Technical sciences. 2005. 2 (130). P. 105 – 107. (rus.)
[15] Aygumov M.M., Aslanbegov A.I. Technologies for strengthening the foundations of emergency and reconstructed buildings. Resource- and energy-efficient technologies in the construction complex of the region. 2019. 11. P. 328 – 332. (rus.)
[16] Galay B.F., Serbin V.V., Galay O.B. Experience of compaction of subsidence soils in the North Caucasus. Geotechnics. 2018. 10 (5-6). P. 42 – 50. (rus.)
[17] Wei W.-L., Chen Y.-Q., Gao Z. Research on damage effect of the concrete target under the penetration and explosion integration. Structures. 2022. 47. P. 1511 – 1523.
[18] Ivanov E.S., Yasinetsky V.G. Deep hydrovibro-compaction of loess soils. Hydraulic engineering and melioration. 1972. 2. P. 41 – 46. (rus.)
[19] Li W., Yi Y., Puppalab A.J. Effects of curing environment and period on performance of lime-GGBS-treated gypseous soil. Transportation Geotechnics. 2022. 37. Article 100848.
[20] Ibragimov A.M., Krasavina O.N., Gnedina L.Yu., Zabotina L.Yu. Thermal method of fixing soils and strengthening bases. Construction materials, equipment, technologies of the XXI century. 2008. 7 (114). P. 19 – 20. (rus.)
[21] Ebailila M., Kinuthia J., Al-Waked Q. Sulfate soil stabilisation with binary blends of lime–silica fume and lime–ground granulated blast furnace slag. Transportation Geotechnics. 2022. 37. Article 100888.
[22] Noskov I.V. Emergency condition of buildings during local soaking of loess subsidence soils. Polzunovsky bulletin. 2007. 1-2. P. 60 – 62. (rus.)
[23] Mavlyanova N.G., Ismailov V.A., Larionova N.A. Comparative assessment of the influence of methods of soaking and silicatization of loess soils on increasing their seismic properties in the regional conditions of Uzbekistan. Engineering geology. 2017. 4. P. 72 – 81. (rus.)
[24] Cheng Y., Wang Z., Liu K. Analysis of macro and micro freezing characteristics of gravelly soil. Environmental Research. 2022. 216 (2). Article 114600.
[25] Bredikhina N.V., Babynina K.Yu., Antonova A.S. Strengthening of foundation soils in the construction of buildings and structures in the Kursk region. BST: Bulletin of construction equipment. 2022. 8 (1056). P. 56 – 58. (rus.)
[26] Klyuyev S.V., Kashapov N.F., Radaykin O.V., Sabitov L.S., Klyuyev A.V., Shchekina N.A. Reliability coefficient for fibreconcrete material. Construction Materials and Products. 2022. 5 (2). P. 51 – 58. https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2022-5-2-51-58
[27] Kashapov R.N., Kashapov N.F., Kashapov L.N., Klyuev S.V., Chebakova V.Yu. Study of the plasma-electrolyte process for producing titanium oxide nanoparticles. Construction Ma-terials and Products. 2022. 5 (5). P. 70 – 79. https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2022-5-5-70-79
[28] Kashapov R.N., Kashapov N.F., Kashapov L.N., Klyuev S.V. Plasma electrolyte production of titanium oxide powder. Construction Materials and Products. 2022. 5 (6). P. 75 – 84. https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2022-5-6-75-84
[29] Kashapov N.F., Yamaleev M.M., Lukashkin L.N., Grebenschikov E.A., Gilev I.Yu., Kashapov R.N., Kashapov L.N. Structure and analysis of amorphous silicon dioxide nano-particles. Construction Materials and Products. 2022. 5 (6). P. 85 – 94. https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2022-5-6-85-94
[30] Nakhaev M.R. Composite compositions with fine-dispersed filler of various genesis for injection fixing of subsidence soils: dis. ...candidate of Engineering Sciences. Grozny, 2015. 200 p. Bai Yun. Underground Engineering. Planning, Design, Construction and Operation of the Underground Space. Shanghai, 2019. 234 p. (rus.)
Panarin I.I., Fediuk R.S., Vykhodtsev I.А., Vavrenyuk S.V., Klyuev A.V. Injection mortars based on composite cements for soil fixation. Construction materials and products. 2023. 6 (4.) P. 15 – 29. https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2023-6-4-15-29