STABILIZATION OF SUBSIDENCE OF BUILDINGS OF MODERN MEDICAL CENTERS

https://doi.org/10.34031/2618-7183-2021-4-6-5-25
 5-25 p.
The group of deformed structures includes buildings that have received unacceptable subsidence and deformation during the period of their construction and especially operation, which, however, do not interfere with the performance of their main functions, but may eventually collapse. Their causes are errors in engineering and geological surveys and design; violation of the rules for performing construction work and operation of buildings and structures. Long-term geodetic observations of the precipitation of the foundations of buildings on pile foundations have shown that both absolute and relative stabilized values of subsidence in the vast majority of cases are less than them and the normative limit values are calculated. Therefore, the group of deformed buildings on pile foundations includes somewhat less often similar objects with shallow foundations. The reasons for excessive subsidence of the foundations of pile foundations of buildings (and as a result, the occurrence and development of cracks and other deformations in load – bearing structures), in addition to these, are most often: unjustified use of increasing correction coefficients for the results of compression tests of highly acidic soils; the lower ends of the piles falling into layers of weak soil; the tip of the piles sinking from the design mark; overestimation of the bearing capacity of the piles due to non-compliance with the optimal time of their "rest" after immersion or erroneous interpretation of the graphs "load-pile sediment"; excessively close placement of neighboring piles in the plan, which when they are immersed, especially in the sand, leads to "pushing" up previously submerged; uneven loading of piles as part of the grillage; deformation of existing buildings and structures when driving piles near and tongue-and-groove, the development of pits, etc.
Keywords:
center, development, construction, deformation, building
Erykov A.A.
Рostgraduate, Moscow Architectural Institute, Russia
1. Erykov A.A. Sustainable development of the architecture of modern medical center. Innovation and investment. 2020. 3. P. 265 – 268. (rus.)
2. 2nd International Conference on Civil Engineering and Transportation, ICCET 2012. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013. 256 – 259. PART 1.
3. Building- and geotextiles with the extra power of weft. Kettenwirk-Praxis. 2004. 1. P. 17 – 19.
4. In the realm of King Sil. Ground Engineering. 2001. 34 (11). P. 45 – 46.
5. Proceedings of the Geo-Congress. Geotechnical Special Publication. cited By 0. 1998.
6. Proceedings of the 1997 1st National Conference of the ASCE Geo-Institute, Geo-Logan. Geotechnical Special Publication. 1997.
7. Grouting: Compaction, remediation and testing. Geotechnical Special Publication. 1997. P. 1 – 337.
8. Burland J.B.B. Mechanisms of behaviour in foundation-structure interaction – Some case histories. Pre-Failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials. 1999. P. 1143 – 1159.
9. Burland J., Jamiolkowski M., Viggiani C. Preserving pisa’s treasure. Civil Engineering. 2002. 72 (3). P. 42 – 49.
10. Cajka R., Burkovic K., Grundel V. Reinforced concrete structure interaction with tectonically f aulted undermining territory. fib Symposium TEL-AVIV 2013: Engineering a Concrete Future: Technology, Modeling and Construction, Proceedings. 2013. P. 629 – 632.
11. Chadha A.K., Chauhan R.K., Singh M.P., Sharma U. Analysis of tunnel grouting and water pressure tests in Rampur Hydroelectric Project (412MW), SJVN Limited, India. ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2016, WTC 2016. 3. P. 1677 – 1687.
12. Gupta T. Sinkage control of North-West corner of Kolkata high court by consolidation grouting and stabilization using Drucstone chemical grout: A case study. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation. 2020. 5 (1).
13. Handke D., Tempel L. North-South Urban Light Railway Cologne – A challenge for planning and construction – Technical solutions for the accomplishment of the upcoming tasks concerning the tunnels. “Proceedings of the 33rd ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress – Underground Space – The 4th Dimension of Metropolises”. 2007. 2. P. 1161 – 1167.
14. Klepikov S.N., Molochkova N.N. Determination of modulus of deformation of loess soil compacted by hydroblasting method. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 1991. 28 (4). P. 172 – 178.
15. Li Y.-X., Zhu Y.-P., Ye S.-H., He Z.-M.Analysis of foundation non-uniform settlement for building on collapsible loess. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013. 353 – 354. P. 213 – 216.
16. Margarit G., Mallorquí J. J., Pipia L. Polarimetric characterization and temporal stability analysis of urban target scattering. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2010. 48 (4). PART 2. P. 2038 – 2048.
17. Marino G.G., Abdel-Maksoud M.G. Protection measures against mine subsidence taken at a building site. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2006. 18 (2). P. 152 – 160.
18. Meli R., Sánchez Ramírez A.R., Rodríguez M. Protection and Monitoring of Three Temples Close to the Excavation of a Tunnel in Guadalajara, Mexico. RILEM Bookseries. 2019. 18. P. 2161 – 2169.
19. Pakrashi S. Rehabilitation of a Distressed Single Storied Building Founded on Expansive Soil: A Case Study. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A. 2017. 98 (4). P. 571 – 580.
20. Searls C. L., Slaton D., Thomasen S. E. World war II concrete structures on guam. American Concrete Institute, ACI Special Publication. 1991. SP-128. P. 1335 – 1346.
Erykov A.A. Stabilization of subsidence of buildings of modern medical centers. Construction Materials and Products. 2021. 4 (6). P. 5 – 25. DOI: 10.34031/2618-7183-2021-4-6-5-25 https://doi.org/10.34031/2618-7183-2021-4-6-5-25