THE USE OF NANOTECHNOLOGY FOR THE DESIGN OF BUILDING STRUCTURES

https://doi.org/10.34031/2618-7183-2021-4-6-26-47
Russia has a developed industry of building materials, which today implements an energy- and resource-saving model of its development. The implementation of the state policy of resource conservation is carried out in two main directions: the first direction is to save resources in the production of materials, the second is to increase the production of energy–efficient materials that allow saving energy carriers during their operation. Modern construction in Russia is guided by European construction standards, which, in turn, provides for the construction of energy-saving buildings with minimal energy consumption from external sources. This is ensured by the use of structural and thermal insulation materials in the construction of external walls. In modern structural and thermal insulation materials for energy-saving construction, high requirements are imposed on their thermal properties, mechanical strength and comfort level. From the point of view of simultaneous satisfaction of these requirements, ceramic materials have obvious advantages over other materials, in particular cellular concretes, which, with almost the same level of thermal conductivity, are characterized by the least hygroscopicity and significantly greater strength. An objective prospect for the development of structural and thermal insulation ceramics is the production of hollow ceramic stones with increased thermal efficiency for their use in economical single-layer external wall structures without additional insulation. The products of individual Ukrainian manufacturers and even imported analogues of the most famous European manufacturer (Wiernerberger Company, Austria), when used in single-layer walls, do not provide regulatory requirements for the heat transfer resistance of masonry for the first temperature zone of Russia, which occupies the majority of the territory (60%). This requires the improvement of domestic products in the direction of improving their thermal characteristics (reducing thermal conductivity and increasing thermal resistance).
1. Afrooz S., Navimipour N.J. Afrooz S. An effective nano design of demultiplexer architecture based on coplanar quantum-dot cellular automata. IET Circuits, Devices and Systems. 2021. 15 (2). P. 168 – 174.
2. Almatrood A., George A.K., Singh H. Low-power multiplexer structures targeting efficient qca nano-technology circuit designs. Electronics (Switzerland). 2021. 10. № 16.
3. Averyanov D.V., Liu P., Sokolov I.S. Nanoscale synthesis of ionic analogues of bilayer silicene with high carrier mobility. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2021. 9 (27). P. 8545 – 8551.
4. Bellucci L., Delfino F., Tozzini V. In silico design, building and gas adsorption of nano-porous graphene scaffolds. Nanotechnology. 2021. 32 (4).
5. Cortés-Arriagada D., Miranda-Rojas S., Cid-Mora F., Toro-Labbé A. First-principles study of hybrid nanostructures formed by deposited phthalocyanine/porphyrin metal complexes on phosphorene. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2021. 333.
6. Enayati M., Rezai A., Karimi A. Efficient circuit design for content-addressable memory in quantum-dot cellular automata technology. SN Applied Sciences. 2021. 3 (10).
7. Hochrein L.M., Li H., Pierce N.A. High-Performance Allosteric Conditional Guide RNAs for Mammalian Cell-Selective Regulation of CRISPR/Cas. ACS Synthetic Biology. 2021. 10 (5). P. 964 – 971.
8. Lacroix A., Sleiman H. F. DNA Nanostructures: Current Challenges and Opportunities for Cellular Delivery. ACS Nano. 2021. 15 (3). P. 3631 – 3645.
9. Li Q., Li J., Yu W. De novo design of a pH-triggered self-assembled β-hairpin nanopeptide with the dual biological functions for antibacterial and entrapment. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2021. 19 (1).
10. Misra R., Rudnick-Glick S., Adler-Abramovich L. From Folding to Assembly: Functional Supramo-lecular Architectures of Peptides Comprised of Non-Canonical Amino Acids. Macromolecular Bioscience. 2021. 21 (8).
11. Pei Y., Wang L., Tang K., Kaplan D. L. Biopolymer Nanoscale Assemblies as Building Blocks for New Materials: A Review. Advanced Functional Materials. 2021. 31 (15).
12. Penth M., Schellnhuber K., Bennewitz R., Blass J. Nanomechanics of self-assembled DNA building blocks. Nanoscale. 2021. 13 (20). P. 9371 – 9380.
13. Qian X., Nymann Westensee I., Brodszkij E., Städler B. Cell mimicry as a bottomup strategy for hi-erarchical engineering of nature-inspired entities. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology. 2021. 13 (3).
14. Rahali A., Shaukat A., Almeida-Marrero V.A Janus-Type Phthalocyanine for the Assembly of Photoactive DNA Origami Coatings. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2021. 32 (6). P. 1123 – 1129.
15. Sproncken C.C.M., Magana J.R., Voets I.K. 100th Anniversary of Macromolecular Science Viewpoint: Attractive Soft Matter: Association Kinetics, Dynamics, and Pathway Complexity in Electrostatically Coassembled Micelles. ACS Macro Letters. 2021. 10 (2). P. 167 – 179.
16. Sun Q., Zhou G., Meng Z. An integrated computational materials engineering framework to analyze the failure behaviors of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites for lightweight vehicle applications. Composites Science and Technology. 2021. 202.
17. Vikulina A.S., Campbell J. Biopolymer-based multilayer capsules and beads made via templating: Advantages, hurdles and perspectives. Nanomaterials. 2021. 11 (10).
18. Wang J., Li Z., Gu Z. A comprehensive review of template-synthesized multi-component nanowires: From interfacial design to sensing and actuation applications. Sensors and Actuators Reports. 2021. 3.
19. Ye J., Aftenieva O., Bayrak T. Complex Metal Nanostructures with Programmable Shapes from Simple DNA Building Blocks. Advanced Materials. 2021. 33 (29).
20. Zhang J., Zhang H., Wang H. Performance prediction of nanoscale thermal cloak by molecular dynamics. Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing. 2021. 127 (10).
Zhuikov S.V. The use of nanotechnology for the design of building structures. Construction Materials and Products. 2021. 4 (6). P. 26 – 47. DOI: 10.34031/2618-7183-2021-4-6-26-47 https://doi.org/10.34031/2618-7183-2021-4-6-26-47